Things definitely feel a little snappier on the Core i3 Chromebook compared to the Celeron device: Pages often open a few seconds faster and scrolling is slightly smoother, particularly when you have numerous tabs open.īut unlike the last bump in Chromebook processing technology, when we leapt from the early ARM devices to the current Haswell systems, this one is very much of a case of going from "quite good" to "a little better." It's far less of a night-and-day difference - and that perspective is important to keep in mind. In actual use, the differences in performance are apparent but more subtle.The Core i3 Chromebook is pretty much equal with the Pixel in that regard. We're talking a solid several seconds' difference from the time I press the power button to the time the login prompt is on-screen and ready (and relative to Chrome OS, several seconds is a lot). When it comes to boot-up time, Acer's Core i3 Chromebook is significantly faster than the Celeron system.Here's what I've noticed in real-world terms: I've been testing out the 4GB model for the past week and comparing it with both a Haswell-based Intel Celeron system - specifically, Asus's Intel Celeron 2955U-powered Chromebox, with a comparable 4GB of RAM - and the Pixel, which utilizes a Core i5 processor along with 4GB of RAM.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |